Juzzys Journal
politics, art, vegan, Melbourne, life, and just stuff…

Mar

29

Hillary Clinton, dead but not out…

Filed Under International Politics

As reported in the media, Hillary Clinton’s campaign is not dead but waning. She’s rapidly losing the support of the super delegates and there is no question about the support Obama has from the general public.

Obama is running his campaign on individual donations and refusing donations from Washington lobbyists, yet he’s still able to bring in more funding than Clinton.

In the most recent news, In a move which appears to be more damaging for the Clinton campaign former president Bill Clinton has come out attacking Obama over his personal jabs at Hillary.

If Clinton persists with her campaign it will only damage the Democratic party’s chance in the upcoming November election. Clinton doesn’t know how to lose and wont accept it, it would seem that the citizens of the US will have to put up with the battle all the way to the Democratic national conference.

The damage to the Democrats chances may have already happened, giving them a loss to John McCain in November.

What, really, is Mrs. Clinton doing? She is having the worst case of cognitive dissonance in the history of modern politics. She cannot come up with a credible, realistic path to the nomination. She can’t trace the line from “this moment’s difficulties” to “my triumphant end.” But she cannot admit to herself that she can lose. Because Clintons don’t lose. She can’t figure out how to win, and she can’t accept the idea of not winning. She cannot accept that this nobody from nowhere could have beaten her, quietly and silently, every day. (She cannot accept that she still doesn’t know how he did it!)

Should Hillary Clinton retract from the Democrats nomination?
View Results

Declarations – WSJ.com

Comments

4 Responses to “Hillary Clinton, dead but not out…”

  1. Cal on March 29th, 2008 8:37 pm

    I’d rather Clinton over Obama anyday coz a. she’s a woman, and her family is screwed up. Obama seems too vanilla, I mean chocolate.

  2. Cal_t on March 29th, 2008 8:37 pm

    I mean no harm when I said chocolate. Just playing on vanilla if anything

  3. Cal_t on March 30th, 2008 7:07 am

    Why does it edit my comment instead of adding a new one?

  4. Cal_t on March 30th, 2008 7:09 am

    Woops. It didn’t.

    What I meant to say in my original post which has now disappeared is that I would like to see the first woman president, I don’t usually like chocolate anyways but Hillary certainly ain’t no vanilla woman

Leave a Reply